It would be a nice feature if there was ever a CoW2, but this change would be too costly in code & balancing to be a good idea for COW1.
Rivers, Bridges, & Gunboats
I want to suggest the addition of rivers to COW.
Throughout history, navigable rivers have been a key geographic feature of key importance in times of war. Rivers should be added to Call of War to reflect this. I think this feature would add a nice new wrinkle of strategy to the game.
My idea of rivers is this. Large rivers that are traditionally considered navigable waterways, like the Amazon, Mississippi, St. Lawrence, Rhine, Danube, Volga, Yellow, Yangtze, Mekong, Ganges, Indus, Euphrates, Nile, Congo, etc They would be represented as blue lines running across the map. Land route-river junctions will be marked with a circle like where two sea lanes intersect in the ocean. Rivers are considered neutral territory, like other waterways on the map. Any army crossing an unmodified river will act as if it is making a 0 distance sea crossing (3 hours to embark, 3 hours to disembark, 4.5 on enemy territory). Rivers can be traversed by transport ships, but not other Naval units (more on that later). In addition, local ports can be built at river intersections to reduce embarking times.
These rivers will have a new ship patrolling them: the gunboat. A gunboat will be a small and relatively fast ship that's slower and has less HP than destroyers; but is cheaper; does more damage to ships. ground units, & buildings; and has a modest attack range of 25. This ship will serve as a easy way to escort convoys down rivers, defend coastal provinces from landings, and harass enemy units near or the river.
There will be a new structure to make river crossings much faster, the bridge. The bridges is a structure that can be build at a junction can be built between a river and a road. Like ports and naval bases, a user may pick the location of a bridge if more than one location exists inside a province, though a player is not limited to one per province. There will be several tiers of bridges, each one having a different effect on the river junction:
- A level 1 bridge represents a pontoon bridge. It can be built very quickly (30 min) and inexpensively, but has very little HP (5 or 10). When a unit enters the river junction space with a lvl 1 bridge, the unit must stop for 4 hours before it can move off, and does not convert to a transport ship. During this crossing time, a unit is considered stationary and can't attack. If the unit tries to move off the bridge the way it came, it must wait for 4 hours minus the time remaining on its crossing (same as embarking/disembarking).
- A level 2 bridge represents a small temporary bridge. It cost a bit more and takes a bit longer to build (1 or 2 hours). takes 90 minutes to cross and as a bit more HP (20 or so). To build any bridge lvl 2 or greater, a player most control or have "right of way" in all territories the bridge connects to.
- A level 3 bridge represent a large permanent structure that can accommodate heavy traffic. Units can cross the bridge at their normal movement speed with no delay. They take longer to build (6 hours sound good?), cost more, and is much more resilient (I'd say 50 HP).
- Possibly a level 4 bridge level that costs more and has more HP than lvl 3, but is otherwise the same.
- A level 5 bridge is a highly fortified structure. In addition to high cost and massive HP it also prevents non-right of way ships from moving past it on a river.
LMK what yall think about it. How would yall adjust the different units costs and capabilities?
8 Replies
Definitely, should also be levels of Gunboat. Also add river canals.
This would make the game too detailed and complicated, and many new players especially younger ones would not continue
Rivers are an excellent idea along with bridges (maybe not quite as you described them but more or less) but I dont think riverborne units would be a good idea. They're to complicated and have extremely limited uses (plus were only extremely minor factors in the war). Not to say your idea is bad, it just doesnt fit well into the pre-existing game.
tbh i just want Encirclements I
I know I went into a lot of detail, but I'm just trying to give a comprehensive description of my idea. I feel like it's pretty intuitive that an army takes time to cross a river, and that better bridge == faster crossing.Claudio von Panjim wrote:
This would make the game too detailed and complicated, and many new players especially younger ones would not continue
I agree with this, however they would need to implement this in the correct waycl0xy wrote:
tbh i just want Encirclements I
Love this idea, has been suggested frequently.
Post a Reply
Please log in to post a reply.