Which should be changed.oceanhawk wrote:
aircraft you cant have add target, when flying.. (unless moving from air base to air bases)
We can't actually do that.oceanhawk wrote:
They go round in circles, can already do that
24 May 2016, 20:21
Sea mines.
What do you think about on the introduction of naval mines in the game?.
Requirements: -Base Naval level 3.
-Industrial complex level 1.
-Infrastructure level 1.
Objective? Defending the coast against submarines and destroyers.
.jpg)
"I came, I saw, I conquered" Written in a report to Rome 47 B.C., after conquering Pharnaces at Zela in Asia Minor in just five days; as quoted in Life of Caesar by Plutarch; reported to have been inscribed on one of the decorated wagons in the Pontic triumph, in Lives of the Twelve Caesars, Julius, by Suetonius.
"Alea iacta est" Gaius Julius Caesar.
Post a Reply
Please log in to post a reply.
71 Replies
24 May 2016, 20:23
what do you want to change it to?Quasi-duck wrote:
Which should be changed.oceanhawk wrote:
aircraft you cant have add target, when flying.. (unless moving from air base to air bases)We can't actually do that.oceanhawk wrote:
They go round in circles, can already do that
that you can have patrol, and then add patrol?
If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye
24 May 2016, 20:25
Yes, with a time delay (the wait feature).oceanhawk wrote:
that you can have patrol, and then add patrol?
24 May 2016, 20:28
well, something like that is neededQuasi-duck wrote:
Yes, with a time delay (the wait feature).oceanhawk wrote:
that you can have patrol, and then add patrol?
If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye
25 May 2016, 16:41
You would need to have a base to patrol from (like planes). So that the sub would have to go back if cancelling the patrol?
25 May 2016, 16:44
I didn't think of that. Is it possible to make the ports like airbases, kind of like in Hearts of Iron III?wildL SPQR wrote:
You would need to have a base to patrol from (like planes). So that the sub would have to go back if cancelling the patrol?
25 May 2016, 16:47
I don't know.. it was just a suggestion.. Or make it so that patrols can only be within ~100km of owners coastline.. or something..
But I still fail to see the use of a patrol?
The submarine has a good viewing range, so just make a line of subs around your coastlines and you're golden.
25 May 2016, 16:51
This is problematic. It is fine if you are, say, Germany. What if you are the US though? Or you are playing the world map and you have conquered all of Africa, or America again?wildL SPQR wrote:
The submarine has a good viewing range, so just make a line of subs around your coastlines and you're golden.
25 May 2016, 16:56
Like I always say, you can never have too much submarines.Quasi-duck wrote:
This is problematic. It is fine if you are, say, Germany. What if you are the US though? Or you are playing the world map and you have conquered all of Africa, or America again?wildL SPQR wrote:
The submarine has a good viewing range, so just make a line of subs around your coastlines and you're golden.
25 May 2016, 17:19
Unless, of course, they are driving your economy into the ground so you cannot build land forces. We should all know that submarines cannot assault Moscow. Hell, not even Dublin.Paramunac wrote:
Like I always say, you can never have too much submarines.
25 May 2016, 22:52
I am content with my economy. And following sentences are true. I am just now sure how they have anything to do with my statement. Naval units don't assault cities. They provide support to convoys and stop enemy navy to support their convoys.Quasi-duck wrote:
Unless, of course, they are driving your economy into the ground so you cannot build land forces. We should all know that submarines cannot assault Moscow. Hell, not even Dublin.Paramunac wrote:
Like I always say, you can never have too much submarines.
25 May 2016, 23:06
But you can't assault other cities if you have only subs, thus making you have "too much submarines".Paramunac wrote:
I am content with my economy. And following sentences are true. I am just now sure how they have anything to do with my statement. Naval units don't assault cities. They provide support to convoys and stop enemy navy to support their convoys.Quasi-duck wrote:
Unless, of course, they are driving your economy into the ground so you cannot build land forces. We should all know that submarines cannot assault Moscow. Hell, not even Dublin.Paramunac wrote:
Like I always say, you can never have too much submarines.
Forum Gang Premier
you are a balls
you are a balls
26 May 2016, 08:49
Why would I have nothing but submarines? That would be stupid 
26 May 2016, 15:35
Back to what I said earlier, to defend your massive sea borders.Paramunac wrote:
Why would I have nothing but submarines? That would be stupid
27 May 2016, 08:28
Spies work better than subs.
27 May 2016, 15:03
Not for sinking convoys they don't.
The past is a foreign country.
27 May 2016, 20:08
For seeing if your enemies are invading you spies sure works better than subs 
27 May 2016, 20:44
What if everybody is your enemy? Like in Players leaguewildL SPQR wrote:
For seeing if your enemies are invading you spies sure works better than subs
27 May 2016, 20:45
True, but spies can't stop an invasion.wildL SPQR wrote:
For seeing if your enemies are invading you spies sure works better than subs
Forum Gang Premier
you are a balls
you are a balls
27 May 2016, 21:23
I like the idea of minefields in the game, but laying them should be a province upgrade, kind of like naval fortifications. An accuracy note would have to be that mined paths can damage your ships just as well as your enemies. Incorporate a minesweeper unit as a counter to the development to maintain balance. If you really want to give offensive capabilities to the mine weapon then that should be a secondary option for your destroyers / submarines who were primarily responsible for mine deployment during WWII.
Logic is the path to the Dark Side Mr. Spock. :wallbash
Post a Reply
Please log in to post a reply.
