Split the General discussion forum between "After Action Report" and real General Discussion

Everything is in the title. I like (some) After Action Reports, but they now represent 50% of the threads so I think it would be a good idea.

8 Replies

Please stay polite and civil on the forum.

β€œI do not love the sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior. I love only that which they defend.”
β€œIf you win, you need not explain!”
β€œWhat difference does it make if destruction is wrought under the name of dictators or in the name of democracy?”
War is Peace
Slavery is Freedom
Weakness is Strength

Grand, I don't see why you're being so negative. All he is saying is that there should be a separate place for playthroughs. I don't see why this is a big deal. It's no reason to go on an Anti-Chimere tirade.

I, personally, like this idea.

WHOS GONNA CARRY THE BOATS?
WHOS GONNA CARRY THE LOGS?
THEY DON'T KNOW YOU SON!
- David Goggins

@BrutusTrump : GrandEmpire is not upset for the proposal, but for other items. In particular the fact that I don't try to be particularly nice with him.

@GrandEmpire : I am not going to blame anyone for being a bad writer, heck, my very first let's play was poorly written, screenshoots too small to be read properly, full of typos and grandiloquent. You learn with practice.

I am more irritated by constant attention-seeking behavior, but the real trigger is your habit of looking down on people on historical topics even though you actually know very little - Surena being the latest example but not the first one.

Earlier, you had the same kind of behavior when you tried to position yourself as a giver of advice even though you had back then little experience of the game (you have not done that recently, and I don't know how much you improved since then).

I kept my irritation on the threads which generated said irritation, but since you bring it here...

By the way, if someone does a poll "Should I continue this project YES/NO", I don't expect to have to justify my answer. If you wanted a lengthy paragraph of explanation, you should have just asked the question without a poll.

This said, my proposal to split the forum is unrelated to you, and totally genuine. I actually even have a small project if it was ever done that would please everyone (you included).

Wow, you've been doing Let's Plays for a while. 10 years of Let's Plays is a lot. And do you have any more info on the project?

WHOS GONNA CARRY THE BOATS?
WHOS GONNA CARRY THE LOGS?
THEY DON'T KNOW YOU SON!
- David Goggins

ok

β€œI do not love the sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior. I love only that which they defend.”
β€œIf you win, you need not explain!”
β€œWhat difference does it make if destruction is wrought under the name of dictators or in the name of democracy?”
War is Peace
Slavery is Freedom
Weakness is Strength

What? I wasn't trying to be mean, Grand.

WHOS GONNA CARRY THE BOATS?
WHOS GONNA CARRY THE LOGS?
THEY DON'T KNOW YOU SON!
- David Goggins

BrutusTrump wrote:

Grand, I don't see why you're being so negative. All he is saying is that there should be a separate place for playthroughs. I don't see why this is a big deal. It's no reason to go on an Anti-Chimere tirade.

I, personally, like this idea.

they had arguments in a couple of different topics on the forum like β€œthe greatest general forum”

Perhaps a new section called "action reports" could be made and beneath this could be "after-action reports" and "play-throughs".

General Discussions has more than just action reports in it so I think that it should be kept in existence.

Post a Reply

Please log in to post a reply.

Back to Suggestions
Quick Launch