Not to mention one would have to consider if paying 6 bucks a month to create 1 game would even be worth it. I paid for a full year but will not renew if the game creation isn't raised at some point.
Top 20 player
Frontline Pioneer
Can I ask why the creation of new games was restricted behind a paywall? Personally, I can't afford to pay a subscription to this game, that's why I know there are some features I won't use, like sharing intelligence in-game. But, I feel it is very unfair to make this a paid feature. Also, why are players unable to buy a high command title with gold? We already pay for gold, just let us use that. My suggestion is: Let players choose the option of paying for high command with gold instead of actual dollars.
Not to mention one would have to consider if paying 6 bucks a month to create 1 game would even be worth it. I paid for a full year but will not renew if the game creation isn't raised at some point.
I'm working on my ninth straight win ... Currently my biggest desire is that CoW reduced their requirements for coalition victory from 70% down to 65% or even 60% ... This is taking too long when it's obvious that the winning coalition has no serious rivals! ... 
nowaday earning gold is not hard. So the ethnical part is do you want them to work for long hours and not getting paid.
If they are charging high value of gold which is similar to paid the premium, and what is the purpose of doing extra thing.
Please log in to post a reply.