So, I have a suggestion for the next update.What if Pan-Asian planes could kamikaze into battleships and do damage? I feel like this would add a a great concept to the historical aspect of the game, as well as the gameplay itself. Well, that was my suggestion, let me know what you think!
-A democratic China 
(Idk what theese guys are but they look cool so I put them in here.)
Would be a hard feature to utilize. This was a widely unsuccessful tactic as well and wasn't used until last resort, usually at the end of the war. Plus, Japanese weren't the only ones to sacrifice themselves in a time of need. Other nation's troops did the same in many other circumstances.
However, Japanese planes (mostly interceptors and naval bombers) get a sweet bonus and make the PanAsian doctrine the strongest naval doctrine in the game.
I mean near the end of the war. Hermann Goering ordered the Luftwaffe pilots to crash into allied bombers on purpose. This wasn't only successful. Plus these tactics were rarely successful.
Ok, i dont know if you noticed that every doctrine have same units, that is because of game balance. Kamikazes would be pan asian doctrine exclusive unit and that would not work.A democratic china wrote:
So, I have a suggestion for the next update.What if Pan-Asian planes could kamikaze into battleships and do damage? I feel like this would add a a great concept to the historical aspect of the game, as well as the gameplay itself. Well, that was my suggestion, let me know what you think!-A democratic China
and theres really no difference between kamikaze and rockets/flying bombs
Agree, they could change flying bomb name and looks for kamikaze myb and add stats bonuses against naval units.Cloudpop2 wrote:
and theres really no difference between kamikaze and rockets/flying bombs
There is no way this would be an addition to Pan-Asia, as if they did they would need to add something for every other doctrine as a way of balancing. If it was, it would be similar to Naval bombers trying to bomb Lvl 3 Cruisers. BAD AND VERY INEFFECTIVE.
I understand that for the US kamikazes were a decent threat BUT that was only American ships. Remember that American ships, especially the carriers, had WOODEN decks. This means that kamikazes would wreck havoc. Commonwealth ships on the other hand, had steel decks and were barely affected by kamikazes.
Also remember:
Wikipedia wrote:
About 19% of kamikaze attacks were successful.
Most ships sunk weren't even combat ships. The largest ship that the Japanese actually sunk was actually an escort carrier aka light carrier. The largest ship they got close to sinking was USS Bunker Hill, an essex class fleet carrier. However, even after getting struck two times it never sunk. It was simply heavily damgaged and was able to go back to a base to repair.
We don't have Doctrine-excusive units in the game so this won't work.
We already gave the Pan-Asian Doctrine a buff to Flying bombs as a metaphor for Kamikaze attacks.
Never knew about that lol
That's neat didn't think about that.
