That would unbalance the game. If someone surrenders to your enemy, you could be screwed.
Surrender Option
There should be a way to surrender giving all your territories to a nation or coalition. Right now if you want to surrender you have to simply abandon the game or watch all your armies destroyed and territory taken.
I suppose you could trade your capital territory, but there should be a simple way to surrender, having your troops disperse (and equipment destroyed) or giving them over to your enemy.
Post a Reply
Please log in to post a reply.
11 Replies
True, but that's real life isn't it? Hitler faced that with Italy in WWII. You have to encourage your allies to keep fighting.
If someone really wants to surrender and handing over his territory, all he has to do is withdraw his troops and let the enemy march in - where is the problem?WW2er wrote:
There should be a way to surrender giving all your territories to a nation or coalition. Right now if you want to surrender you have to simply abandon the game or watch all your armies destroyed and territory taken.I suppose you could trade your capital territory, but there should be a simple way to surrender, having your troops disperse (and equipment destroyed) or giving them over to your enemy.
WW2er wrote:
..that's real life isn't it? ..

..... >> more or less cleverly camouflaged as a real game <<
.... .. so beware of caltrops, spring-guns and booby traps.
Warning! Texts above this signature may contain traces of irony! :D
You can also already give a few key cities & territories.
buildings get damaged in the process and it can take time to take all provinces.Restrisiko wrote:
where is the problem?
4 per game after day 8. not quite the same is it?CoralWar wrote:
You can also already give a few key cities & territories
This is one of the worst proposed game changes ---- ever.
This is a competitive war game. The object is to win the game by conquest. I see nothing but a potential for abuse in this proposed change. If you think multi-account cheating, wolfpacking and the like were a problem before, those problems would expand several fold if this change were implemented.
True,MontanaBB wrote:
This is one of the worst proposed game changes ---- ever.
the way I see it the OP has not been playing long enough to see the dark side of the COWs
There could be a surrender function... But usually surrendering is the same as making a ceasefire or peace trade, which can already be done. Giving up the land is not what usually happens with surrenders... Surrendering means you make partial concessions to the enemy while still remaining alive as a nation.
I would much rather be able to destroy buildings so that my land was worthless to the enemy than give them everything on a silver platter.
VorlonFCW
Retired from Bytro staff as of November 30, 2020.
>>> Click Here to submit a bug report or support ticket <<<
Maybe just the land? Say you surrender, ALL items belonging to that nation are destroyed, or heavily damaged, and then the player can rebuild it or just ignore it at their leisure.
@temmie1: The "land" determines who wins the game. Victory points are assigned to the various territories of a country; the cities have more points, and the capital cities have the most. And other territories get 0, 1 or 2 points. The first player to get 60+% of all of the victory points on a map, wins.temmie1 wrote:
Maybe just the land? Say you surrender, ALL items belonging to that nation are destroyed, or heavily damaged, and then the player can rebuild it or just ignore it at their leisure.
That's why surrendering your land to another player is not permitted. You can trade provinces, within certain limits, but you cannot surrender or give away your entire country.
Post a Reply
Please log in to post a reply.