Basically assimilating those provinces?
13 Jun 2022, 17:50
Kind regards,
Donk
Bytro game addict and avid CoW player.
"Γ" > "th"
Π‘Π»Π°Π²Π°
Π£ΠΊΡΠ°ΡΠ½Ρ!
Donk
Bytro game addict and avid CoW player.
"Γ" > "th"
Π‘Π»Π°Π²Π°
Π£ΠΊΡΠ°ΡΠ½Ρ!
the abillity to integrate certain territories
so idea is the abillity to turn certain non core provinces into core provinces to get greater resource income out of them, for balancing ive come up with a few ideas:
(1 ONLY regions who's orginal country had the same doctrine as you can be integrated as core provinces to keep track of what can and cant be integrated i suggest adding doctrine symbols next to the "non core province/core province of" tag/picture
(2 a region MUST have above 95% morale before it can integreated as a core territory
(3 integrating costs resources and time depending on how valuable the region is, for example a region with literally nothing would cost only 2 hours and like 5000 money and some goods in integrate as a core territory while a resource node would cost like 12 hours 15000 money more goods and then some of whatever resource it produces
a city a bit more then that and a city with double resource node like a full 2 days 70000 money and a pile of resources
(4 once intergrated its morale drops all the way back down to 40%
7 Replies
13 Jun 2022, 18:54
In my opinion 1. 2. And 3. All combined would make for a balanced but useful feature.
14 Jun 2022, 07:52
basically yeah but like i said only provinces who's orginal owner had the same doctrine as youDonk2.0 wrote:
Basically assimilating those provinces?
14 Jun 2022, 14:42
The problem with a suggestion like this that it's EITHER:
- too expensive, no one will bother;
- too cheap, and the basic game mechanism (the value of conquested territory is much less than core ground, so cautious players still have a fighting chance against the speedrushing hawks) is ruined;
- just right, and it doesn't matter.
14 Jun 2022, 20:51
fair enoughK.Rokossovski wrote:
The problem with a suggestion like this that it's EITHER:- too expensive, no one will bother;
- too cheap, and the basic game mechanism (the value of conquested territory is much less than core ground, so cautious players still have a fighting chance against the speedrushing hawks) is ruined;
- just right, and it doesn't matter.
15 Jun 2022, 03:22
I don't exactly get what you mean for "just right, and it doesn't matter". Please clarify?K.Rokossovski wrote:
The problem with a suggestion like this that it's EITHER:- too expensive, no one will bother;
- too cheap, and the basic game mechanism (the value of conquested territory is much less than core ground, so cautious players still have a fighting chance against the speedrushing hawks) is ruined;
- just right, and it doesn't matter.
Also, maybe the best place would be between "too expensive" and "just right", so that annexation/integration is costly in the short run but for turtles or out of reach provinces it is worth.
17 Jun 2022, 11:07
Bruh I wanna invest into china and expand that communist core, that would be very bing chilling
Make HWW all in, a staple gamemode
Post a Reply
Please log in to post a reply.
