there should be a land transport for naval units

i think this would be help full for countries like the russian empire on the european map and to make it balanced it would be slower than the plane transport.

“When diplomacy ends, War begins.”
Adolf Hitler

Post a Reply

Please log in to post a reply.

13 Replies

One does not simply move a 30k ton ship across land. They could move a frigate across land at best. However, there is no chance of moving any heavier ships. By far the most absurd suggestion I have heard.

John is a peaceful citizen. He wakes up, and brushes his teeth. He hears something out of his window. He looks out, and sees a battleship about the size of his town being towed by a tractor through main street. He yawns and goes back to bed. Just another day in Call of War.

WHOS GONNA CARRY THE BOATS?
WHOS GONNA CARRY THE LOGS?
THEY DON'T KNOW YOU SON!
- David Goggins

BrutusTrump wrote:

John is a peaceful citizen. He wakes up, and brushes his teeth. He hears something out of his window. He looks out, and sees a battleship about the size of his town being towed by a tractor through main street. He yawns and goes back to bed. Just another day in Call of War.
ah yes i guess i didnt think about that
“When diplomacy ends, War begins.”
Adolf Hitler

lolurbadkid wrote:

i think this would be help full for countries like the russian empire on the european map and to make it balanced it would be slower than the plane transport.
I think that it is not possible to transport 40.000 tones havy battleships on land.
Фарис Синановић, Суна

vietcong2005 wrote:

One does not simply move a 30k ton ship across land. They could move a frigate across land at best. However, there is no chance of moving any heavier ships. By far the most absurd suggestion I have heard.
You could move light ships such as destroyers at a speed slower than a RR gun.

Tre wrote:

You could move light ships such as destroyers at a speed slower than a RR gun.
Unnessesery complication and too mutch work for nothing rlly.
Фарис Синановић, Суна

LOL though I think it might be nice if we could get... commercial use planes in the game, to transport units with helicopters and planes, paratroopers are bad against tanks ;)

Suna232 wrote:

Tre wrote:

You could move light ships such as destroyers at a speed slower than a RR gun.
Unnessesery complication and too mutch work for nothing rlly.
Yeah I agree.

the only thing that was kind of transported accross land in WWII was subs

“I do not love the sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior. I love only that which they defend.”
“If you win, you need not explain!”
“What difference does it make if destruction is wrought under the name of dictators or in the name of democracy?”
War is Peace
Slavery is Freedom
Weakness is Strength

"By far the most ridiculous suggestion ever". indeed

“I do not love the sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior. I love only that which they defend.”
“If you win, you need not explain!”
“What difference does it make if destruction is wrought under the name of dictators or in the name of democracy?”
War is Peace
Slavery is Freedom
Weakness is Strength

I think having ships stuck in the ocean is cool because it lets you use the most out of the map. Say you need to move a ship from the Pacific to the Atlantic. You can go through Panama or if that area is too risky take the northern passage in Canada.

I agree

Suna232 wrote:

Unnessesery complication and too mutch work for nothing rlly.

BrutusTrump wrote:

John is a peaceful citizen. He wakes up, and brushes his teeth. He hears something out of his window. He looks out, and sees a battleship about the size of his town being towed by a tractor through main street. He yawns and goes back to bed. Just another day in Call of War.
LOL
Noob

Post a Reply

Please log in to post a reply.

Back to Suggestions
Quick Launch