This can also be based off the current lvl 3 infrastructure which is in the form of train tracks.
28 Jul 2015, 02:04
Trains
I would love to see Trains in this, If you had your own country you wouldn't march troops and tanks across the country. You would put them on trains. Would have to be a high level to get them but would be cool.
10 Replies
28 Jul 2015, 02:23
Dr. Sheldon Cooper has been detected! Beware of him!
28 Jul 2015, 09:36
Yeah, infrastructure kind of incorporates a railroad as an "all inclusive" type deal. Infrastructure gives you all the benefits of a railroad (increased resources and faster movement speed) all built right in.
Still, it would be fun to have the railroad separated. It's fun building a rail system.
28 Jul 2015, 12:12
We have talked about armoured trains(ART maybe?) and we seemed to like the idea.
Forum ArmyField Marshall
Mess with the Bill, you get the scorn!
Mess with the Bill, you get the scorn!
6 Aug 2015, 13:48
I think it would be real cool to build a rail system. Then as the enemy try and bomb it to stop you from moving supplies and troops quickly.
6 Aug 2015, 14:12
As we have already said, there is already trains.
Forum ArmyField Marshall
Mess with the Bill, you get the scorn!
Mess with the Bill, you get the scorn!
6 Aug 2015, 17:04
And the trains don't have the mechanics to even be a train. Despite how much you bomb the province, the only way to cripple a railway is to capture the province with boots on the ground in hopes that you destroy the railway only to rebuild it again.Butter Ball Bill wrote:
As we have already said, there is already trains.
6 Aug 2015, 17:09
No...
You can use bombers to damage buildings with nukes and strat bombers being the best for it.
Forum ArmyField Marshall
Mess with the Bill, you get the scorn!
Mess with the Bill, you get the scorn!
6 Aug 2015, 17:10
Really? I've only seen infrastructure get damaged when there's units on the ground. I guess I'll have to look into it furtherButter Ball Bill wrote:
No...You can use bombers to damage buildings with nukes and strat bombers being the best for it.
7 Aug 2015, 17:03
Enlightened2 wrote:
Still, it would be fun to have the railroad separated. It's fun building a rail system.
Remember, we are in a WWII strategy game, not in a sequel of any railroad game. The infrastructure includes the railroads and it is far enough.
Ci Vis Pacem Para Bellum
Post a Reply
Please log in to post a reply.
