Please read all - During World War 2 and in the years following, all the major powers used some kind of airlifters for equipment. Why is this not in the game? I understand how it could be exploited, but it could be debuffed like other units. Sometimes the game takes way too long, even though it's strategic. Often times necessary equipment being sent to the frontlines arrive way too late to even do anything. I would suggest it act as an expensive transport ship of the sky. If this doesn't please people, I say infrastructure should be made cheaper/faster so it can actually be used. If workers in cities can make a fully functional airport and production facility in 30 minutes, then they should be able to make some railroad in the same time.
Post a Reply
Please log in to post a reply.
12 Replies
1 Aug 2023, 00:11
There is no ‘problem’ with using gold, at least from Bytro’s perspective. As far as they are concerned, the more players who use gold, the better. It is the reality that if players are restricted in what they can do from gold use, they will no longer see it as reasonable to pay for this (Premium!) currency, and will understandably move on to other strategy war games - this is not good for Bytro.
people need to understand that Bytro wants to provide the best experience for everyone - but they also need to make a profit, and a reasonable profit at that. They will never implement any changes like this, I can almost 100% guarantee.
Have a blessed day <3
1 Aug 2023, 00:17 (edited)
SamPGS_17 wrote:
There is no ‘problem’ with using gold, at least from Bytro’s perspective. As far as they are concerned, the more players who use gold, the better. It is the reality that if players are restricted in what they can do from gold use, they will no longer see it as reasonable to pay for this (Premium!) currency, and will understandably move on to other strategy war games - this is not good for Bytro.
people need to understand that Bytro wants to provide the best experience for everyone - but they also need to make a profit, and a reasonable profit at that. They will never implement any changes like this, I can almost 100% guarantee.
Eh you're right, how do I remove threads? I just figured that this would get a lot of support because I hear people complain about it 24/7.
1 Aug 2023, 00:35
user41089881 wrote:
SamPGS_17 wrote:
There is no ‘problem’ with using gold, at least from Bytro’s perspective. As far as they are concerned, the more players who use gold, the better. It is the reality that if players are restricted in what they can do from gold use, they will no longer see it as reasonable to pay for this (Premium!) currency, and will understandably move on to other strategy war games - this is not good for Bytro.
people need to understand that Bytro wants to provide the best experience for everyone - but they also need to make a profit, and a reasonable profit at that. They will never implement any changes like this, I can almost 100% guarantee.
Eh you're right, how do I remove threads? I just figured that this would get a lot of support because I hear people complain about it 24/7.
Oh you don’t have to remove it, it may become a place for helpful discussion. It’s just that a lot of similar suggestions have been made on the forum, and essentiallly the answer is that bytro likes money (which isn’t a bad thing I hasten to add) and so won’t really nerf gold.
Have a blessed day <3
1 Aug 2023, 00:53
SamPGS_17 wrote:
user41089881 wrote:
SamPGS_17 wrote:
There is no ‘problem’ with using gold, at least from Bytro’s perspective. As far as they are concerned, the more players who use gold, the better. It is the reality that if players are restricted in what they can do from gold use, they will no longer see it as reasonable to pay for this (Premium!) currency, and will understandably move on to other strategy war games - this is not good for Bytro.
people need to understand that Bytro wants to provide the best experience for everyone - but they also need to make a profit, and a reasonable profit at that. They will never implement any changes like this, I can almost 100% guarantee.
Eh you're right, how do I remove threads? I just figured that this would get a lot of support because I hear people complain about it 24/7.
Oh you don’t have to remove it, it may become a place for helpful discussion. It’s just that a lot of similar suggestions have been made on the forum, and essentiallly the answer is that bytro likes money (which isn’t a bad thing I hasten to add) and so won’t really nerf gold.
Ok, I'll just rename the suggestion to something else.
2 Aug 2023, 02:13
Any prior replies are from a past suggestion, I am reusing the post since I don't want to spam my suggestions and I don't know how to delete them.
2 Aug 2023, 09:47
user41089881 wrote:
Please read all - Unit icons are so messed up. For example, the Me 262 is in Call of War. Having a fighter jet icon racing over the map is pretty badass right? Nope, instead all interceptor units are just imaged as a mundane prop plane. Now I understand that most mobile devices wouldn't have the proper hardware to run every single unit icon if they were all different. However, I suggest we have a full rework of them, let me explain. For example, the unit imaged for the interceptor is the Messerschmitt Bf 109. Instead of having separate unit types for each level, there would be multiple images to match different variants of the same aircraft. For example, level 1-4 interceptor would look just the same as it is, but the unit type would be listed as Bf 109A, Bf 109B, Bf109C, and Bf109D which all are real variants. And the remaining levels would be the Messerschmitt Me 262A, Messerschmitt Me 262B, and the Messerschmitt Me 262C. Get the picture? This would go for almost all units so that way they are more organized and simplistic whilst also looking way cooler with more advanced units like fighter jets and tanks. I know this would be a big undertaking but there are already so many units with long names that don't match the symbol shown in the game. And if need be, all units can just be simplified down into 2 image icons so that way mobile devices can run them easier and they can be categorized way better.
not that important
Glory to the Union! Glory to the Red Army! Glory to the Revolution! Marshal of the Forum High Command
2 Aug 2023, 16:01
The game being super disorganized and not aesthetically appealing? That sounds like a problem to me. And some people I know have some smaller issues like, not being able to run the game. You definitely didn't read more than a few sentences.
2 Aug 2023, 17:44
user41089881 wrote:
The game being super disorganized and not aesthetically appealing? That sounds like a problem to me. And some people I know have some smaller issues like, not being able to run the game. You definitely didn't read more than a few sentences.
No, he has a point. This would take a lot of effort and time to do for something that is honestly rather minor and doesn’t affect most people. The developers have way more important things to do than this. You have to remember that their time and resources are very limited and that this suggestion would take ages to implement for every level of every doctrine and on every unit. Not to mention cost for creating all the unit models! It simply can not be done, especially for for now.
It’s also not a good look to accuse people of something without proof. Just because they didn’t agree with you does not mean they didn’t attempt to understand your argument, and form an opinion.
CarKing the 6th of the Abrahamic Caliphate
2 Aug 2023, 17:49
Carking the 6th wrote:
user41089881 wrote:
The game being super disorganized and not aesthetically appealing? That sounds like a problem to me. And some people I know have some smaller issues like, not being able to run the game. You definitely didn't read more than a few sentences.
No, he has a point. This would take a lot of effort and time to do for something that is honestly rather minor and doesn’t affect most people. The developers have way more important things to do than this. You have to remember that their time and resources are very limited and that this suggestion would take ages to implement for every level of every doctrine and on every unit. Not to mention cost for creating all the unit models! It simply can not be done, especially for for now.
It’s also not a good look to accuse people of something without proof. Just because they didn’t agree with you does not mean they didn’t attempt to understand your argument, and form an opinion.
Alright, but I know he barely understood the suggestion because he didn't even put out a proper sentence versus you who actually gave a reason. I'll change the suggestion once again into something more simple.
2 Aug 2023, 17:51
That’s how Zhukov is half the time. Short sentences. Get used to it when talking to him lol.
CarKing the 6th of the Abrahamic Caliphate
2 Aug 2023, 21:42
Lol
Blunt and straight to the point
Glory to the Union! Glory to the Red Army! Glory to the Revolution! Marshal of the Forum High Command
