Slight note: The model for the Allied battleships is actually the King George V class.
I hope they will have late war models for the rest of the units.
12 Dec 2020, 21:00
I should probably change what I write in here. -No one ever
Unit Graphics
I think that there should be a change to the graphics for certain units in their respective doctrines.
Allied:
-change battleships from New York class warships to Iowa class warships (basically the old nuclear battleships would look great)
-change the interceptors from spitfires to p51 mustangs
-change cruisers from the Italian style to Atlanta class cruisers
Soviet:
-change interceptors from 1-15 to yak 9 or la5's
Pan-Asian:
-change cruisers from the Italian style to mogami class cruisers
Axis:
-change cruisers from the Italian style to Admiral Hipper cruisers
These little changes make the game more fun to play as each nation has visually pleasing units that make sense for their doctrines. Personally, I dont like to play either of the soviet or allied doctrines because their units aren't pleasing to look at like the axis and pan-asian units.
4 Replies
14 Dec 2020, 14:58
Still waiting for Commonwealth tech tree....TomtheBuilder wrote:
The model for the Allied battleships is actually the King George V class.
14 Dec 2020, 15:44
Not nesscessarilly a tech tree, more like new unit models, allies doctrine but commonwealth units.whowh wrote:
Still waiting for Commonwealth tech tree....TomtheBuilder wrote:
The model for the Allied battleships is actually the King George V class.
I should probably change what I write in here. -No one ever
15 Dec 2020, 02:20
That would be nice but they would need a different doctrine logo. (the US flag really should never represent something specific to the commonwealth)TomtheBuilder wrote:
Not nesscessarilly a tech tree, more like new unit models, allies doctrine but commonwealth units.
Either way a benefit of a new doctrine would be variety. there are just too many nations with the allied doctrine. What the doctrine would focus on would also be confusing I suppose. The US doctrine is too much like what Britain's doctrine has historically been. Perhaps it could be a trade off of unit HP but for speed. Another alternative would be to go down a path where there is a stronger economy (better building buffs or base output) in exchange for unit speed.
It could have buffed up ships (specifically destroyers and carriers but possibly battleships) and improved motorized units (mot infantry, SP arties, SP AA, Mech infantry) but weaker foot units and neutral armored units.
Post a Reply
Please log in to post a reply.
