How? If everyone can do it then itβs not gonna hurt anyone. Right now people with gold have an advantage. Iβd rather have it where no one does lol.
CarKing the 6th of the Abrahamic Caliphate
If you can build units with resources, why can't you heal them with resources? There should be an option to heal existing units by spending resources. The player would also be able to specify how much damage they want to heal. The amount of resources spent would be calculated by multiplying the amount of each resource it would take to build a fresh unit by the amount of damage the player wishes to heal.
Please log in to post a reply.
How? If everyone can do it then itβs not gonna hurt anyone. Right now people with gold have an advantage. Iβd rather have it where no one does lol.
It's gonna hurt Bytro if people don't have to spend gold to heal units anymore.
So we should end capitalism! Glory to the Union!
Given how real-world communist uprisings tend to end, we'd better commit to comprehensively planning out exactly how we're going to end capitalism, and what it's going to be replaced with, before embarking on that. But when we have enough volunteers I'm game.
Like what is referenced there? Nah, revolt! For the people!
Without even thinking it through? Yeah that's gonna go well.
Me and @TheZhukov will take charge until a proper government can be put in place. What could go wrong?
I dunno... one of you could turn into a power-hungry megalomaniac, get Drunk On The Dark Side, or simply be corrupt to begin with? And if you have absolute power (which you will before long) we're never getting rid of you except by another equally ill-fated revolution. To be quite safe I think I'd better temporarily take up the leadership role as the first citizen instead.
A man named CarKING and you think I wouldnβt fit that role? Get down, the nation belongs to the people!
What, you want to reintroduce oppressive monarchy? A single human in charge of the whole nation simply because he was born into the right family? Why do that when you could have a leader chosen by the people themselves on merits of his own? Or hers, as the case could well be.
Edit: realised it would be hilarious if we were having this little discussion in the thread about politics.
By your logic, a lady should be in place of a king? Of course not! But in the end the glorious revolution is our greatest shot!
No; by my own argument, one's rank ought to be considered irrelevant when one's potential leadership capabilities are considered. If the people would prefer to be led by someone who happens to already be nobility, that's fine, as long as said nobility doesn't use it to insist on acquiring said leadership.
Then a peopleβs council led by Zhukov and I is a sure way to give prosperity!
Ah, but have the people voted for you?
I am the people.
https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/IAmTheNoun
[Insert interminable Revenge of the Sith memes here as well if you wish, but I can't be bothered putting in the five seconds it would take to retrieve one from the internet.)
No more pay to win! No more booster cards! No more gold! No more spamming on day 1!
You'll join the revolution then?
Glory to the People!
The army stands with you comrade!
Please log in to post a reply.