Supremacy Logo

WHAT THE ACTUAL HECK- doctrine of china

WHY DID YOU CHANGE CHINA TO PAN ASIAN IN HWW!!!!??? I CAMPAIGNED IT TO BE CHANGED OUT OF AXIS BUT INTO ALLIES NOT PAN ASIAN. COME ON IT MAKES NO SENSE!

Equipmentwise, china would be allies.

Ideology wise china would be allies.

allies wise china would be ALLIES

historical wise CHINA WOULD BE ALLIES

NOT PAN ASIAN

PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE CHANGE

“I do not love the sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior. I love only that which they defend.”
“If you win, you need not explain!”
“What difference does it make if destruction is wrought under the name of dictators or in the name of democracy?”
War is Peace
Slavery is Freedom
Weakness is Strength

Post a Reply

Please log in to post a reply.

30 Replies

2 Mar 2021, 11:07 (edited)

DoctorDR1 said it's for balancing, not many have pan Asian. Maybe check harder why, instead of spamming childish posts?

Comrade genz| Master of Forum Major General
2 Mar 2021, 11:13

He said wrong!

True. there aint a lotta of Pan Asian- but then there aint no Axis either- so why the change? Honestly Axis makes more sense

PLus why would Allies unbalance it?????

“I do not love the sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior. I love only that which they defend.”
“If you win, you need not explain!”
“What difference does it make if destruction is wrought under the name of dictators or in the name of democracy?”
War is Peace
Slavery is Freedom
Weakness is Strength
2 Mar 2021, 11:16

May axis around the world, try finding the same number of pan asian, how can a lvl 108 player post this?

Comrade genz| Master of Forum Major General
2 Mar 2021, 11:21

Bruh balancing matters not in number of doctrines in a region- youd be looking at balance of power

“I do not love the sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior. I love only that which they defend.”
“If you win, you need not explain!”
“What difference does it make if destruction is wrought under the name of dictators or in the name of democracy?”
War is Peace
Slavery is Freedom
Weakness is Strength
2 Mar 2021, 11:34

@Agent Orange pls make this kid understand

Comrade genz| Master of Forum Major General
2 Mar 2021, 12:51

The devs changed it for balancing, as there are not many pan-Asian countries. Their decision was also based on fighting style, as their fighting style was similar to the Japanese.

GrandEmpire wrote:

allies wise china would be ALLIES
That sounds funny but OK.

"A single death is a tragedy; a million deaths is a statistic." - Joseph Stalin
Found a bug or need help? Send a ticket here!
2 Mar 2021, 12:55

I think it should be allies too. He has a great point

2 Mar 2021, 13:48

Tibet

"In my humble opinion, on the subject matter, topic and content discussed beforehand; I would like to humbly propose, convey my idea on the subject and remark; this, with the help of the afforementioned post" - Karl von Krass
"The Golden Spire is looking for members, Anyone with good sense of game mechanics and a discord account can apply"
Secretary of Nova0213
2 Mar 2021, 14:44

I mean honesty I don't care about this that much because Pan Asian doctrine isn't that bad. Both Axis and Pan- Asian doctrines are good for aggressive players.

2 Mar 2021, 15:13

Yes

2 Mar 2021, 16:16

The changing of the Chinese doctorine was due to the lack of countries with the Pan-Asian doctrine. Before the update, only Japan, Siam, and Manchukuo had that doctrine. What puzzles me is why Mongolia has Comitern doctrine? That makes no sense.

2 Mar 2021, 16:25

Andromeda wrote:

What puzzles me is why Mongolia has Comitern doctrine? That makes no sense.
Mongolia was a satellite state of the Soviet Union at the time.
"A single death is a tragedy; a million deaths is a statistic." - Joseph Stalin
Found a bug or need help? Send a ticket here!
2 Mar 2021, 16:29

Mongolia had never fully adopted Communism, was not included in agreements like the Warsaw Pact or the Comintern, and has been historically tied to the Orient more than Russia/Europe. Pan-Asian just makes more sense for Mongolia.

2 Mar 2021, 16:51

Andromeda wrote:

Mongolia had never fully adopted Communism, was not included in agreements like the Warsaw Pact or the Comintern, and has been historically tied to the Orient more than Russia/Europe. Pan-Asian just makes more sense for Mongolia.
the red army once occupied mongolia

link to the source

“ To command is to serve, nothing more and nothing less.”
For support ticket click here
forum rank list(the better one)
join my discord server>discord.gg/nbydn7sEaS
2 Mar 2021, 17:17

you being stupid grand. Pan Asian is good and makes sense for China. There’s ton of axis axis almost has more the allies South America is nearly all axis and half of afrcia is axis and most of Europe is axis to.

when being betrayed betray

Post a Reply

Please log in to post a reply.

Back to Suggestions
Quick Launch