wdym
2 Mar 2021, 17:22
when being betrayed betray
WHAT THE ACTUAL HECK- doctrine of china
WHY DID YOU CHANGE CHINA TO PAN ASIAN IN HWW!!!!??? I CAMPAIGNED IT TO BE CHANGED OUT OF AXIS BUT INTO ALLIES NOT PAN ASIAN. COME ON IT MAKES NO SENSE!
Equipmentwise, china would be allies.
Ideology wise china would be allies.
allies wise china would be ALLIES
historical wise CHINA WOULD BE ALLIES
NOT PAN ASIAN
PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE CHANGE
“I do not love the sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior. I love only that which they defend.”
“If you win, you need not explain!”
“What difference does it make if destruction is wrought under the name of dictators or in the name of democracy?”
War is Peace
Slavery is Freedom
Weakness is Strength
“If you win, you need not explain!”
“What difference does it make if destruction is wrought under the name of dictators or in the name of democracy?”
War is Peace
Slavery is Freedom
Weakness is Strength
Post a Reply
Please log in to post a reply.
30 Replies
2 Mar 2021, 17:22
healthy wealthy and wise?
when being betrayed betray
2 Mar 2021, 17:24
Historic World War 1939Larry is god lol lol wrote:
healthy wealthy and wise?
“ To command is to serve, nothing more and nothing less.”
For support ticket click here
forum rank list(the better one)
join my discord server>discord.gg/nbydn7sEaS
For support ticket click here
forum rank list(the better one)
join my discord server>discord.gg/nbydn7sEaS
2 Mar 2021, 17:30
oh yes. No idea why it’s ally’s doesn’t make sense.
when being betrayed betray
2 Mar 2021, 17:32
what that word in between means?Larry is god lol lol wrote:
“ To command is to serve, nothing more and nothing less.”
For support ticket click here
forum rank list(the better one)
join my discord server>discord.gg/nbydn7sEaS
For support ticket click here
forum rank list(the better one)
join my discord server>discord.gg/nbydn7sEaS
2 Mar 2021, 18:09
I answered this already in another thread about the same topic.
freezy wrote:
The change was made for multiple reasons:a) There were too few pan-asian countries on the historical map. We increased that diversity. It wasn't the only Doctrine change btw, if you look closely.
b) We looked at the tech that Nationalist China used, and it used tech from all kinds of countries, from allies over axis to even japanese. So this wasnt a strong factor for giving them a particular Doctrine.
c) Because of their fighting style. It wouldnt make sense to give them Axis Doctrine which has super strong and expensive units, and it wouldnt make sense to give them Allied with super good research. Comintern might make sense, and so does Pan-Asian.
2 Mar 2021, 21:40
no the COMMUNIST chinese fought with ambushes the Chinese had an allied style.
Plus there are other reasons and ONE more country wont fix the balance
“I do not love the sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior. I love only that which they defend.”
“If you win, you need not explain!”
“What difference does it make if destruction is wrought under the name of dictators or in the name of democracy?”
War is Peace
Slavery is Freedom
Weakness is Strength
“If you win, you need not explain!”
“What difference does it make if destruction is wrought under the name of dictators or in the name of democracy?”
War is Peace
Slavery is Freedom
Weakness is Strength
2 Mar 2021, 21:47
Did you actually READ freezy's response?GrandEmpire wrote:
no the COMMUNIST chinese fought with ambushes the Chinese had an allied style.Plus there are other reasons and ONE more country wont fix the balance
1. Freezy didn't mention ambushes, instead freezy mentioned equipment.
2. Freezy said, "It wasn't the only Doctrine change btw, if you look closely."
"A single death is a tragedy; a million deaths is a statistic." - Joseph Stalin
Found a bug or need help? Send a ticket here!
Found a bug or need help? Send a ticket here!
2 Mar 2021, 22:41
Bruh equipment the Chinese had ALLIED equipment in 1939- Axis in 1932- comintern gave weapons to the COMMUNIST chinese- and while China was at war with japan they barely used Pan Asian equipment
“I do not love the sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior. I love only that which they defend.”
“If you win, you need not explain!”
“What difference does it make if destruction is wrought under the name of dictators or in the name of democracy?”
War is Peace
Slavery is Freedom
Weakness is Strength
“If you win, you need not explain!”
“What difference does it make if destruction is wrought under the name of dictators or in the name of democracy?”
War is Peace
Slavery is Freedom
Weakness is Strength
3 Mar 2021, 00:05 (edited)
1Again, the most important factors is:
Game balance and diversity
2 even if chinese used allied equipment mostly since 1942 pan-asian doctrine Is the best on a fighting Style perspective, they are the best on terms of guerrilla and use of light units.
Now into históric argument China even with their large Manpower most of them we're equiped just with rifles with bayonets and even just a dao sword, Also china had very outdated armament, they just simply lack industrial capability, allied doctrine Is not the optimal foro them
Also suicidal Tactics we're very common in chinese army at the Time, similar to Banzai charges. Daré to die corps are the best example.
One last argument Is their uniform, chinese uniform of the kmt we're very similar to the japanese ones in the game.
"Si crees que esto tendrá un final feliz, es que no has estado prestando atención"
Post a Reply
Please log in to post a reply.
