Which Unit Would Make the Best Impact to COW?

Transport aircraft and Paratroopers..

I dont think you can have one without the other

it would mean that lets say, you manage to go behind enemy lines..

You capture an airfield..

Now you can fly in reinforcements..

oceanhawk wrote:

purplepizza117 wrote:

Maximilien wrote:

Aircraf carrier.

Oh yes, the current ones suck!

why do you think the carriers suck?

I think they good..

purplepizza117 wrote:

oceanhawk wrote:

purplepizza117 wrote:

Maximilien wrote:

Aircraf carrier.

Oh yes, the current ones suck!

why do you think the carriers suck?I think they good..

Sarcasm.

purplepizza117 wrote:

oceanhawk wrote:

purplepizza117 wrote:

Maximilien wrote:

Aircraf carrier.

Oh yes, the current ones suck!

why do you think the carriers suck?I think they good..

Sarcasm.

oceanhawk wrote:

Transport aircraft and Paratroopers..

I dont think you can have one without the other

it would mean that lets say, you manage to go behind enemy lines..

You capture an airfield..

Now you can fly in reinforcements..

_The_Burn_ wrote:

oceanhawk wrote:

Transport aircraft and Paratroopers..

I dont think you can have one without the other

it would mean that lets say, you manage to go behind enemy lines..

You capture an airfield..

Now you can fly in reinforcements..

Transport aircraft in and of themselves would be good. Of course, they couldn't carry tanks or anything but it would be a great benefit to be able to quickly send units from one side of the map to the other.

Id like to see a slight loading time in air fields do..

but still I think they are needed badly, in the game!

oceanhawk wrote:

Transport aircraft and Paratroopers..

I dont think you can have one without the other

it would mean that lets say, you manage to go behind enemy lines..

You capture an airfield..

Now you can fly in reinforcements..

Pablo22510 wrote:

oceanhawk wrote:

Transport aircraft and Paratroopers..

I dont think you can have one without the other

it would mean that lets say, you manage to go behind enemy lines..

You capture an airfield..

Now you can fly in reinforcements..

I disagree. No need for transport aircraft. Only units that were transported by aircraft were Commandos (Pegasus Bridge) and Paras. And havin' a whole new unit just for two units I don't like. Let's just get Paras. The simpler the better.

a lot of units, were flowin around.. often un assembled

can transport, Infantry, Light tanks, rockets, AA guns

oceanhawk wrote:

not true..

a lot of units, were flowin around.. often un assembled

can transport, Infantry, Light tanks, rockets, AA guns

Pablo22510 wrote:

oceanhawk wrote:

not true..

a lot of units, were flowin around.. often un assembled

can transport, Infantry, Light tanks, rockets, AA guns

Not whole divisions.

but same way its not just one aircraft..

its usually a few of them..

doubt there are 325 pilots for one bomber..

oceanhawk wrote:

true..

but same way its not just one aircraft..

its usually a few of them..

doubt there are 325 pilots for one bomber..

Pablo22510 wrote:

oceanhawk wrote:

true..

but same way its not just one aircraft..

its usually a few of them..

doubt there are 325 pilots for one bomber..

Dude, it's a squadron.

oceanhawk wrote:

that can carry a few light tanks..

Quasi-duck wrote:

oceanhawk wrote:

that can carry a few light tanks..

I respectfully disagree. A few is not a full battalion (400-1000 troops). At best WWII transports could only carry tanks with so light armour they barely withstood 50. cal fire.

I guess they couldnt be carried, by one group of Transport aircraft, but obviously, you can get more aircraft..

But I see your point..

What do you think should be transport worthy?

oceanhawk wrote:

A unit of LT here.. has 625..

oceanhawk wrote:

What do you think should be transport worthy?

Quasi-duck wrote:

oceanhawk wrote:

A unit of LT here.. has 625..

With all due respect I both said troops and will point out that 625 is a number between 400-1000.

oceanhawk wrote:

What do you think should be transport worthy?

Infantry, AA, arty, AT, militia.

I presume, you are including, Motor infantry, and mech here as well

oceanhawk wrote:

I think.. Rockets, Commandos, as well as maybe armored cars?

oceanhawk wrote:

I presume, you are including, Motor infantry, and mech here as well

Quasi-duck wrote:

oceanhawk wrote:

I think.. Rockets, Commandos, as well as maybe armored cars?

Hm, commando's too but AC have the same problem as LT. Rockets, well, the launch pads are problematic. I don't even think they fit in. Look at the Cuban Missile Crisis, they had to be shipped and took up the deck of the ship.

oceanhawk wrote:

I presume, you are including, Motor infantry, and mech here as well

No, same problem as LT. I mean, half-tracks and jeeps are heavy. At Arnhem they were lucky to get a couple of jeeps dropped in.

range,

detection,

I guess, you couldnt get a few halftracks there..

but you could get a few jeeps there no bother.

and these are not going to be para dropped either..

only paratroopers, and commandoes should be able to parachute.

oceanhawk wrote:

but you could get a few jeeps there no bother.

Quasi-duck wrote:

oceanhawk wrote:

but you could get a few jeeps there no bother.

Imma just say one thing: You cannot get a couple hundred jeeps form A to B in one lift.

lets say that then is transformed into a transport aircraft..

there is 400 manpower requiered for a unit of tac bombers

that is 6 crew per bomber, hence 66 bombers..

66 planes, are more than capable of taking a few jeeps..

or we can even actually take a prob transport aircraft

c-47 have crew of 3

that is 132 aircraft, per unit

132 prob transport aircraft, are more than capable of taking a few jeeps..