Less population = less production. Did you check that?
10 Aug 2016, 22:33
Why do Pacific map provinces produce less food (?)
Why do the food-producing provinces on the Pacific produce 5 to 10% less on average than their counterparts on the European maps (as measured by base production amounts before improvements)? Given the vast distances of the Pacific theatre of war and the resulting negative impacts on provincial morale and production, this seems like an especially poor design choice by the developers. I would like to hear from one of the developers as to their reason for this . . . .
5 Replies
10 Aug 2016, 22:52
Asia population >> European population
Besides, resource production has no correlation to province population. Some less populous areas produce more food and rare materials. Sort of like Kansas and West Virginia.
11 Aug 2016, 07:20
I didn't play that new pacific map yet, but in other maps I played rare materials in core provinces have base production of 1500 per day with small variations, while other resources have 3000 per day with variations. I am not sure if those variations are the consequence of population differences, but it doesn't seem that way.
11 Aug 2016, 18:13
Exactly right regarding resource production numbers on the European maps. The Pacific map seems to have reduced those typical resource production numbers by 5 to 10 percent, which is especially troublesome for food production on a much bigger map.Paramunac wrote:
I didn't play that new pacific map yet, but in other maps I played rare materials in core provinces have base production of 1500 per day with small variations, while other resources have 3000 per day with variations.
15 Aug 2016, 00:37
Messrs. Game Developers, I'm still looking for a response to this question.
Thanks.
Post a Reply
Please log in to post a reply.
